2024’s “Epic Voyage”

2024’s “Epic Voyage”

It’s been a long time since I updated Goshawk’s blog – or indeed any of my website! I was going to write a post about the (inevitable!) issues that we encountered with Goshawk of Mon last summer, but I thought that before I did so, it might be good to report on the fun that we all had on what we called our “epic voyage.”

Heading down the Stour

We loaded Goshawk up on 5th August, and then, on 6th August, we cast off from our mooring on a bright, warm and sunny morning. We were blessed with a steady breeze from the south, which could not have been better. We flew down the Stour, through Harwich Harbour (where we picked up a decent bit of speed), then straight up the Orwell towards Ipswich. We were sailing so well that we only dropped the sails as we approached the commercial port in Ipswich.

Heading up the Orwell

As we reached the head of the river, we radioed the Ipswich lock operator – only to discover that whilst our radio had functioned well enough during a test between Goshawk and my brother’s boat the previous day – the radio operator could not hear us. We managed to call the operator who assured us that the lock gates were open and we could simply motor through. This was a massive relief as, having never passed through lock gates in Goshawk before, I think we were all a little worried!

We passed through the lock gates with ease, and then tried to radio Ipswich Beacon Marina – inevitably with no success. We managed to phone them and were allocated a side-to berth, between two other boats. The gap looked very small and tricky to get into – not helped by the Orwell Lady getting a little impatient. Feeling under intense pressure I slipped Goshawk into reverse and – to my very great delight – performed an absolutely perfect docking!

We were very impressed with the Ipswich Beacon Marina – its central location was very handy; we were able to walk into the town centre to meet my cousin and her daughter for coffee, as well as do a little shopping in Tesco Express. Its proximity to a Pizza Express (indeed, we could see Goshawk from our table!) was particularly appreciated by our children. The facilities were ideal, and the charges were very reasonable.

Goshawk in Ipswich Marina

Unfortunately we were disturbed a little by a plane circling overhead for many hours. We became aware after a while that a plane had been flying above us for some time, and when we checked my Plane Finder app, we spotted that a police plane had indeed been flying in circles immediately overhead for some time. The next morning it transpired that a person had been tragically murdered just outside the marina, which meant that we were left with a rather sour taste of Ipswich as we left.

Plane circling overhead

Our sleep was also initially disturbed by the automatic bilge pump activating every five minutes… Luckily I was able to disable this without too much difficulty (there being no way to turn it off)!

On day 2 of our epic voyage we motored out of the marina and then, under just the foresail, gentled sailed down to Suffolk Yacht Harbour. As we sailed down the Orwell past Pin Mill we spotted Arthur Ransome’s former boat, the Nancy Blackett, which greatly excited the children (and, if I’m honest, me!), who are big fans of Swallows and Amazons.

Passing the Nancy Blackett

Docking at Suffolk Yacht Harbour was a little more tricky, but we managed to berth without issue, nose first against a pontoon. The previous year when visiting SYH we found ourselves tucked in next to an outfall pipe, so we felt very lucky to have a proper berth on this occasion! Having eaten at Pizza Express the previous night we had a “boat tea” before using the excellent shower facilities and getting an early night.

Docked at Suffolk Yacht Harbour

Day 3 began with a bit of exploration by foot of the area around SYH, before heading back to Wrabness. The wind was directly on our nose leaving Suffolk Yacht Harbour so, whilst some brave people tacked down the Orwell, we motored to Harwich, when we put the sails up and took advantage of the stiff breeze to get back to our mooring in a pretty decent time.

Motoring towards Felixstowe

I think it’s fair to say that we all enjoyed our epic voyage, and, apart from the issue with the radio, Goshawk treated us well and performed beautifully!

Living with Type 1 Diabetes: Transitioning to an Insulin Pump

I was first diagnosed with Type 1 Diabetes in 2020 when I was in my early forties. It came completely out of the blue, and deeply shocked me. The biggest shock came when I arrived home in the evening of my diagnosis and had to inject myself with insulin for the first time. Initially, as someone who hates needles, I could’t bring myself to do it. I realised, though, that this was now going to be a necessity for the rest of my life.

Over the next four years I became accustomed to injecting myself multiple times a day – morning and evening with Levemir, a long acting insulin, and with Novorapid and subsequently Fiasp every time I ate. This is a very common way to manage Type 1 Diabetes, and is often referred to as multiple daily injections (MDI). I took pride in the precision and control I achieved through this method—diligently counting carbs, adjusting doses for exercise, and keeping a close eye on glucose levels. My results were good—exceptional, even—and, although I was aware in insulin pumps, the thought of switching to a pump felt unnecessary, perhaps even risky. I worried about handing over some control of my diabetes management to an algorithm, fearing that a pump would interfere with my carefully maintained balance. But a conversation with my endocrinologist changed my perspective and made me consider the potential benefits of automation.

Initial Reservations About Moving to a Pump

The biggest hurdle for me was the concept of relying on an algorithm to manage my insulin needs. Would a machine understand the nuances of my body as well as I did? My endocrinologist, however, was persuasive. He explained that a hybrid closed-loop system could relieve some of the mental burden associated with managing diabetes. With such a system, I wouldn’t have to manually adjust my basal rates as often, and I might sleep through the night without waking up to address high or low blood sugars. It wasn’t about giving up control, he argued, but rather about sharing the workload with a system designed to keep me within target ranges automatically. He encouraged me to meet with my diabetic nurse to explore the options.

Meeting with My Diabetic Nurse

When I met with my diabetic nurse, she introduced me to several pump options that were available through the NHS. We discussed the Omnipod 5Tandem T-Slim with Control IQCamAPS FX with Ypsopump, and the Medtronic 780G. She explained the features of each, their compatibility with continuous glucose monitors (CGMs), and how they could potentially lighten the mental load of daily diabetes management. While each pump offered some form of hybrid closed-loop technology, each came with its own set of strengths and challenges. I, somewhat surprisingly, quickly came to the conclusion that perhaps I should, after all, opt for an insulin pump. The question then was, which would work best for me and my needs?

Key Considerations

I approached the decision with a clear set of priorities. I wanted a pump that would help me maintain tight glucose control, aiming for levels as close as possible to non-diabetic ranges. Given that I enjoy swimming, running, and sailing, I needed a system that wouldn’t hinder my active lifestyle. Additionally, integration with my existing data setup was crucial—I use xDrip4iOS to display glucose levels on my iPhone and Garmin watch through Nightscout, and I wanted to maintain this visibility, even if it meant considering a switch to an Apple Watch.

Weighing the Options

I decided to carefully review each of the options on offer to see if one or other of these would be suitable for my lifestyle.

Omnipod 5

The Omnipod 5 immediately appealed to me for its tubeless design. As the only pump without tubing, it seemed ideal for my active lifestyle, allowing freedom during swimming and running without having to worry about tubing getting in the way. The Omnipod 5 also integrates directly with the Dexcom G6 and, as of 2024, the Freestyle Libre 2 Plus, making it a versatile option.

Pros: Tubeless and waterproof; freedom of movement; seamless integration with Dexcom G6 and the upcoming option for Freestyle Libre 2 Plus.

Cons: While it’s great for daily use, it lacks the deep integration with xDrip4iOS out of the box, requiring additional setup for some of the third-party apps I currently use.

Tandem T-Slim with Control IQ

The Tandem T-Slim has earned a reputation for accuracy and predictive adjustments. Its Control IQ algorithm is designed to prevent highs and lows by making real-time changes to basal insulin, working in tandem with the Dexcom G6. The touchscreen interface and compact design make it user-friendly, though it’s a tubed system, which posed a concern for my more active pursuits.

Pros: Customisable glucose targets, strong integration with xDrip4iOSNightscout, and Garmin.

Cons: The tubing could be cumbersome during sports, and while it’s effective for maintaining good control, it lacks the tubeless freedom of the Omnipod 5.

CamAPS FX with Ypsopump

The CamAPS FX with Ypsopump offers a highly adaptive algorithm that adjusts to individual glucose patterns over time. It’s controlled through a smartphone app, giving users flexibility in adjusting settings and monitoring trends. For someone like me, who is detail-oriented, the ability to fine-tune the algorithm was appealing.

Pros: High adaptability; excellent for those who want to target near non-diabetic glucose ranges; control via smartphone app.

Cons: As a tubed pump, it’s less convenient for my active lifestyle, and its integration with xDrip and Garmin is not as seamless, often requiring workarounds.

Medtronic 780G

The Medtronic 780G offers a well-regarded SmartGuard technology, which adjusts basal rates automatically and can deliver correction boluses. It’s designed to keep glucose levels as close as possible to 5.5 mmol/L. The Guardian 4 CGM integrates directly with the pump, offering a streamlined experience. However, the proprietary CGM means limited options if I wanted to stick with my Freestyle Libre or Dexcom.

Pros: Robust closed-loop system with automatic corrections; designed for those looking to maintain tight control.

Cons: Tubed design can be restrictive; limited third-party integration, making it difficult to continue using xDrip4iOS or Nightscout for data visibility.

Choosing the Omnipod 5

After weighing up the pros and cons, I settled on the Omnipod 5. Its tubeless design suited my lifestyle, allowing me to continue my activities without having to disconnect from the pump. The ability to use either the Dexcom G6 or Freestyle Libre 2 Plus gave me flexibility, and its future compatibility with the Libre sensor made it a forward-looking choice.

While the NHS will eventually cover the cost, I am currently on a waiting list. To avoid delays, I’ve decided to self-fund the Omnipod 5 until I reach the top of the list, allowing me to benefit from its features right away.

Transitioning from Freestyle Libre 2

Since the Omnipod 5 requires a Dexcom G6 or the newer Freestyle Libre 2 Plus for automated insulin delivery, I needed to decide which sensor to use. The Dexcom G6 offered zero calibrationseamless integration with xDrip4iOS, and the ability to see my glucose levels on my iPhone lock screen and Garmin watch. In contrast, the Freestyle Libre 2 Plus has a longer wear time of 15 days, but integrating it with xDrip4iOS would have required a third-party transmitter.

After careful consideration, I opted for the Dexcom G6. While it requires more frequent changes, it integrates smoothly with the Omnipod 5 and fits well with my existing setup, making it easier to monitor my glucose trends and maintain the tight control I aim for.

Conclusion: A Balancing Act Worth Embracing

The decision to transition from MDI to an insulin pump was not made lightly. It required a willingness to embrace change and let go of some of the control I’d held tightly for years. Yet, the Omnipod 5 offers the right balance between freedom and precision, allowing me to maintain my active lifestyle while benefiting from the automation of insulin delivery. The transition to the Dexcom G6 complements the Omnipod 5 by keeping my data accessible and visible across my devices.

For anyone in a similar position, wondering whether a pump might be right for them, my advice is to think about what truly matters in your management. Whether it’s freedom of movementseamless integration with technology, or reducing the mental load of diabetes, there is likely a solution that can make life just a bit easier. As I continue this journey, I’m hopeful that the Omnipod 5 will not only improve my diabetes management but also enhance my overall quality of life.

It’s a very low tide tonight

It’s a very low tide tonight…

…and Goshawk’s sitting on the mud.

And so the season begins

And so the season begins

Our 2024 sailing season didn’t get off to the best of starts. After we hit a rope in the water last season, which rendered our engine unusable, we had a new prop shaft and coupling installed (at great expense, inevitably) over the winter. It transpires that when the boat was reengineered prior to our purchase the job had been bodged (which disappointingly didn’t show up on the marine survey) hence the damage was greater than it should have been.

Pool of water, even after we’d pumped out gallons of the stuff

The boat was prepared and launched ready to sail around to her summer mooring on May 5th. Or at least, this should have been the case. Unfortunately when we visited on May 4th to drop off luggage, fill the water tank etc, the boat was full of water. We pumped her out and left, returning the next day to discover she was full of water once again. Unfortunately the marine engineers had failed to seal the new prop shaft properly, which caused her to flood, doing great damage to the new coupling, the interior of the boat, the electrics, the soft furnishings and more. I was absolutely seething and told the engineers in no uncertain terms that I expected them to put right at their expense, and to cover any additional marina expenses. Credit to them, they did, and actually did an improved job. It was very disappointing to (once again) launch Goshawk later than we had intended.

Thankfully drier, and coupling re-reinstalled

In the end, we eventually sailed from the marina to Wrabness on Sunday 26th May. I say we, it was just the children and me, with a slightly hairy North Sea section, but we made it, and for the most part we had an excellent sail. A consistent stiff southerly enabled us to spin round from the North Sea to Wrabness on one tack. We even managed to overtake a very sleek looking much newer yacht as we headed up the Stour!

We moored Goshawk up and then abandoned her for a few weeks.

We arrived back at Wrabness on Saturday and on Sunday motored out to her to check her over. She was looking great with minimal bird poo and a very dry bilge. What’s more, the engine was fully functioning!

Ready for action

Today we managed to get aboard her again and went for a sail. We left the mooring under sail, headed to the number 5 (green) buoy, turned round and went with the outgoing tide almost to number 1 buoy. When we departed the breeze was a reasonably brisk northerly, but as we passed Harkstead it spun to the east, which was slightly irritating! We ended up tacking a few times, before turning and running back. Not for the first time I was very impressed with how easily Goshawk goose wings.

Under sail

We ran for a while, but then aware that the tide was moving fast and we were not, we dropped the sails and motored back to the mooring.

Motoring back

Not the greatest sail, but so lovely to be back on the water. And at least we’ve started bringing the cost per sail down a little!

So who came closest? Analysing Poll Accuracy in the 2024 Mid Sussex Election

So who came closest?Analysing Poll Accuracy in the 2024 Mid Sussex Election

PollLiberal DemocratConservativeLabourReform UKGreenTOTAL DIFFERENCE
ELECTION RESULT39.627.117.611.13.8N/A
Yougov4324.517.411.33.76.5
Electoral Calculus45.325.1188.33.810.9
New Statesman31.524.518.714.85.417.1
Electionmapsuk33.22421.615519.3
More in Common30282410620.2
Financial Times3124.224.316.23.124
IPSOS25302811529.2
Survation25.129.329.810.34.830.7

At Mid Sussex Election Watch we carefully monitored the pre-election opinion polls to get a sense of how the election might turn out in our constituency. Now that the election has happened we thought it might be interesting to go back and look at just how accurate these polls were. We looked at the difference between the actual result and the prediction for each party in each poll, and then calculated the total difference across all the parties for each poll. This proved to be very interesting.

Among the various polls analyzed, YouGov emerged as the most accurate, with a total difference of just 6.5 percentage points across all parties. This poll was particularly spot-on with its predictions for Labour, Reform UK, and the Green Party, with minimal deviations from the actual results. Such accuracy reinforces YouGov’s reputation as a reliable source for gauging public sentiment.

In second place was Electoral Calculus, which had a total difference of 10.9 percentage points. While slightly less precise than YouGov, Electoral Calculus still provided relatively close estimates, especially for the Liberal Democrats and the Green Party.

The other polls showed more significant discrepancies. For instance, More in Common and Financial Times had larger total differences of 20.2 and 24 points, respectively. These polls overestimated support for Labour and underestimated the Liberal Democrat vote share, highlighting the challenges pollsters face in capturing the shifting dynamics of voter behavior.

Interestingly, Survation and IPSOS were the least accurate, with total differences of 30.7 and 29.2 points, respectively. These polls significantly underestimated the Liberal Democrat performance while overestimating Labour’s share. Such variances underscore the inherent uncertainty in polling, where methodological differences and sampling errors can lead to varied results. Funnily enough, it was the Survation poll that Labour consistently chose to use in their election material. (One of their leaflets was headlined, “Poll after poll shows Lib Dems a distant third in Mid Sussex,” without mentioning that actually it was several versions of the same poll that made this prediction…!).

Election Maps UK provided a new perspective with a total difference of 19.3 points. While not the closest, it offered a fairly accurate prediction compared to other polls, highlighting the evolving landscape of polling methodologies.

Conclusion

Yougov has a reputation for accuracy, and in future elections it is certainly worth reflecting their data. Electoral Calculus is also worth a look. As for the others… well, perhaps take their data with a large pinch of salt!

The Future of the Conservative Party: A Former Supporter’s Perspective

The Future of the Conservative Party: A Former Supporter’s Perspective

Introduction

At the time of writing, the General Election of 2024 has just taken place. The Labour Party have gained a significant parliamentary majority, and the Conservatives have taken an absolute kicking. Yet the Labour Party’s success was largely as a result of the almost total collapse of the Conservative Party’s support base. Harold Macmillan is reputed to have commented that “oppositions don’t win elections, government’s lose them” and this would seem to be particularly the case on this occasion; the Conservative Party’s share of the vote dropped by a significant 19.9%, whilst Labour’s increased by a paltry 1.6%. Something has clearly gone very wrong for the Conservative Party, and many have suggested that this could be the end of the party. I have felt no love whatsoever towards the Conservatives in recent years, but I would be very sad to see the party die out entirely. I personally don’t believe that this is the case, but I do believe that the party is at a significant crossroads, and the road chosen at this juncture will inevitably determine whether the party is to ever hold office again.

I hope, in this rather lengthy essay, to offer my perspective on what has gone wrong for the party, and how the Conservatives could – indeed, should – move forward.

From Devotion to Detestation

As a former ardent supporter of the Conservative Party, I have had significant involvement with the party, both at grassroots level and nationally. I happened to be born on Margaret Thatcher’s first day in office – which might have shaped my political destiny. I remember meeting my local MP, George Gardiner, on several occasions as a small child, and being greatly inspired by him. (I also remember meeting John Redwood when I was a slightly larger child, and being surprised by how rude and arrogant he was, but that’s not a story for today…) My political involvement rapidly increased whilst reading History and Politics at university. During this time I launched Conservative Future at my university and served as its founding chairman, successfully growing it into the largest political group on campus, to the great shock of many, as the university I attended had a reputation for being particularly left wing.

My commitment extended beyond the university setting; I played a significant role in two parliamentary campaigns at the constituency level, working closely with a prospective parliamentary candidate (PPC). Additionally, I stood for local council on two occasions and worked nationally with the party during election campaigns. I regularly travelled to London to work at the top-secret GENEVA (General Election Voluntary Agency) cold-calling people and asking them whether they might consider voting Conservative.

Despite this history of dedication, recent years have seen my once fervent support of the party transform into outright detestation. And I don’t think that’s an exaggeration.

The Turning Point: Brexit, Boris Johnson and COVID-19

My pro-European stance and strong opposition to Brexit have been key factors in this shift. It was, in my view, a grave misjudgment on David Cameron’s part to promise a referendum in an attempt to appease the Eurosceptics within the party and to limit the damage that Nigel Farage and UKIP could cause to the Conservatives electorally in the 2015 General Election. This decision not only fractured the nation but also set the stage for subsequent turmoil. The ascension of Boris Johnson to party leadership only compounded my disillusionment. Johnson, in my opinion, was fundamentally unsuited to high office. His tenure was marred by numerous scandals, including the infamous partygate, where lockdown-breaking parties at Downing Street during COVID-19 restrictions exemplified his disregard for the rules he imposed on the nation. Furthermore, his systematic elimination of some of the most capable members of the party in favour of promoting friends who were profoundly unsuitable further eroded my confidence. Notable examples include the sidelining of seasoned politicians like David Gauke and Rory Stewart, who were replaced by the likes of Dominic Cummings and Gavin Williamson, figures whose tenures were marked by controversy and incompetence.

The Conservative government’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic also contributed significantly to my disillusionment. The poor provision of personal protective equipment (PPE) to medics on the front line, including my wife, a consultant in a major accident and emergency department, was appalling. The establishment of a VIP lane, which ensured that friends and associates of the government were paid over the odds for useless PPE, further highlighted the corruption and incompetence within the party. Figures like Baroness Michelle Mone benefited to the tune of hundreds of millions of pounds of taxpayers’ money, while frontline workers were left unprotected and vulnerable. This scandal exemplifies the party’s prioritisation of cronyism over public service.

The Truss Catastrophe

The brief yet disastrous leadership of Liz Truss further exacerbated my frustrations. Her tenure saw the economy crash following her “mini-budget,” which included unfunded tax cuts that spooked financial markets and led to a dramatic rise in borrowing costs. The pound plummeted to historic lows, and the Bank of England was forced to intervene to stabilise the situation. This period of economic mismanagement highlighted a troubling trend within the party towards more extreme right-wing policies that prioritise ideology over practical governance.

Scandals and Corruption: A Party Unfit to Govern

Over the last few years, the Conservative Party has been rocked by numerous scandals, each highlighting its unfitness to govern. The Owen Paterson affair, where the government attempted to rewrite parliamentary standards to protect an MP found guilty of breaching lobbying rules, showcased blatant disregard for ethical governance. Additionally, the Greensill scandal, involving former Prime Minister David Cameron’s lobbying on behalf of a financial services company, exposed the deep-rooted cronyism within the party.

The previously-mentioned partygate scandal, where senior officials, including Boris Johnson, were found to have attended social gatherings in violation of lockdown rules, further eroded public trust. The handling of the HS2 project, marked by delays and ballooning costs, demonstrated incompetence in managing large infrastructure projects. The housing scandal involving Robert Jenrick, who unlawfully approved a housing development for a Tory donor, highlighted how personal interests were prioritised over the public good.

Ethical scandals have also marred the party. For instance, Conservative MP Rob Roberts faced suspension after being found to have sexually harassed a member of staff, and MP Charlie Elphicke was jailed for sexual assault. Additionally, Matt Hancock, the former Health Secretary, resigned after breaching social distancing guidelines by having an affair with an aide, further highlighting the party’s moral failures.

The Right-Wing Shift: Braverman and Patel

Figures like Suella Braverman and Priti Patel have played influential roles in pushing the party further to the right. Their hardline stances on immigration and asylum policies, exemplified by Patel’s controversial Rwanda deportation plan, demonstrate a complete lack of compassion that is antithetical to the values I believe should underpin the Conservative Party. The recent electoral defeat, which I view as a deserved rebuke, underscores the urgent need for reflection and change within the party.

The Election Night Evisceration

Despite having been a loyal Conservative for most of my life, it gave me great pleasure seeing the party being eviscerated on election night. Witnessing figures like Liz Truss and Jacob Rees-Mogg lose their seats was particularly gratifying. Their policies and actions have, in my view, significantly damaged the party’s reputation and strayed far from its founding principles.

The Crossroads: Choosing the Future Path

The Conservative Party now stands at a critical crossroads. This juncture could either mark the beginning of a return to moderate, compassionate conservatism or further descent into right-wing extremism. A choice of moderate leadership, embracing the one-nation Toryism that once characterised the party, could see me return to the fold. Such a shift would align with my belief in a balanced, empathetic approach to governance and policy-making. Leaders like Jeremy Hunt, who advocate for pragmatic policies and fiscal responsibility, could restore my faith in the party’s direction.

Victoria Atkins, a prominent figure within the party, represents a potential leader who could steer the Conservatives back to their one-nation roots. As the daughter of former Conservative MP Robert Atkins, she has a strong political pedigree and has served in various ministerial roles, including as Minister of State for Prisons and Probation. Her approach to politics has often emphasised compassion, justice, and effective governance, making her a candidate who could rebuild the party along traditional, moderate lines. Atkins’ leadership could appeal to those of us who long for a return to a more inclusive and principled Conservative Party.

However, the likelihood of Atkins succeeding Rishi Sunak and leading the party in this direction seems slim. The Conservative Party membership, who enthusiastically backed Liz Truss in her leadership bid, demonstrated a preference for more extreme right-wing policies. Truss won the leadership contest with a significant majority, securing 57.4% of the vote against Rishi Sunak’s 42.6%. This overwhelming support for Truss reflects a broader trend within the party’s base that may resist the moderation and inclusivity that someone like Atkins would bring. Instead, the membership is more likely to support figures such as Suella Braverman or Kemi Badenoch, who advocate for staunchly conservative, right-wing policies that resonate more deeply with the current ideological leanings of the party’s grassroots. Braverman’s hardline immigration policies and Badenoch’s vocal opposition to “woke” culture and progressive social policies have made them favourites among the more conservative elements of the party.

Bringing People Together: The Path to Consensus

To succeed, the Conservative Party needs to bring people together and build consensus, firstly within the party itself and then within the country. In recent years, the party has focused more on sowing division and distrust, adopting a divide and conquer strategy. This approach has played out in various ways, from the rhetoric surrounding Brexit, which often pitted different regions and demographics against each other, to the handling of immigration, where inflammatory language has been used to stoke fear and division.

For instance, the government’s hardline stance on immigration has often portrayed immigrants as a threat, creating an atmosphere of hostility and fear. Similarly, the party’s approach to Brexit frequently involved demonising the European Union and presenting the situation as a battle between patriotic Britons and malevolent foreigners. This divisive rhetoric has not only deepened societal rifts but also alienated many moderate voters who yearn for a more inclusive and collaborative approach to governance.

Bringing people together requires a shift in strategy. The party must engage in genuine dialogue, listen to diverse viewpoints, and seek common ground. Within the party, this means fostering an environment where different factions can coexist and collaborate towards shared goals. Nationally, it involves promoting policies that unite rather than divide, emphasising common interests and shared values.

The Need for Radical Thinking

To be successful, the party needs to be radical in its thinking. It must confront the issues affecting our society head-on, beginning with the political system itself. The first-past-the-post voting system is no longer fit for purpose. Countries like Germany and New Zealand have moved away from this system in favour of proportional representation, which more accurately reflects the will of the electorate and ensures that all votes carry equal weight. Britain needs to adopt proportional representation to create a fairer and more inclusive political landscape.

The physical infrastructure of our political institutions also needs modernisation. The Houses of Parliament, while historically significant, are outdated and ill-suited to the needs of a 21st-century democracy. Transforming them into a museum and constructing a new, state-of-the-art parliament building would symbolise a commitment to progress and renewal. Additionally, the House of Lords, an unelected and archaic institution, should be replaced with a less antiquated second chamber that better represents the diversity and dynamism of contemporary Britain.

The taxation system also requires a complete overhaul. The current system is convoluted and often perceived as unfair. By ripping it up and introducing a new, more equitable system, the party could address the growing disparities in wealth and ensure that everyone pays their fair share. Radical thinking needs to extend to the NHS, social care, and prisons as well. The NHS, while a cherished institution, faces significant challenges that require innovative solutions and sustainable funding models. Social care must be integrated with health services to provide seamless support for the elderly and vulnerable, and the prison system needs reform to focus on rehabilitation and reducing reoffending rates.

The party also needs an approach to business that will fire up the economy, beginning with gaining access to the market right on our doorstep: Europe. Re-establishing strong economic ties with the European Union would provide British businesses with the stability and opportunities they need to thrive. This would not only boost the economy but also help heal the divisions caused by Brexit.

Reclaiming the Centre Ground

The future of the Conservative Party hinges on its ability to reclaim the centre ground. Demonstrating both compassion and competence is not only the right course of action but also the only viable path to regaining public trust and electoral success. My concern, however, remains that the party will capitulate to the demands of the far-right, distancing itself further from the mainstream of British politics. The choices made in the coming months will determine not only the party’s direction but also whether it retains supporters like myself, who yearn for a return to a more inclusive and moderate conservatism.

For the good of the country, it is essential that the Conservative Party successfully rebuilds itself. The presence of a strong opposition is vital for a functioning democracy, ensuring that the government remains accountable and that diverse perspectives are represented in the policymaking process. A reinvigorated Conservative Party, guided by principles of compassion and competence, can play a crucial role in maintaining the balance necessary for a healthy democratic system.

Conclusion: A Path Forward

In conclusion, the Conservative Party stands at a pivotal moment. Its decision to either embrace a moderate, compassionate future or continue its drift towards right-wing extremism will determine its relevance and success in the coming years. As a former supporter, my hope is that the party will choose a path that prioritises the needs of the country and its most vulnerable citizens, fostering an environment where ethical governance and inclusive policies can thrive. Only then will the Conservative Party regain the trust and support of those who, like myself, long for a return to its principled and compassionate roots.

If the party adopts a platform that places the needs of the country before its own interests and looks to protect the most vulnerable in society, I would gladly consider rejoining and playing an active role. This would mean embracing policies that support public services, address income inequality, and offer compassionate solutions to social issues such as immigration and homelessness. A commitment to ethical governance and a rejection of self-serving political manoeuvres are crucial. I envision a Conservative Party that not only seeks electoral success but also strives to improve the lives of all citizens, particularly the most disadvantaged. Such a party would resonate with my core values and principles, compelling me and many others like me, traditional Conservative voters who have felt disenfranchised for the last two elections and opted to support other parties, to willingly return to the fold.

However, I would never consider rejoining a party that continues its current trajectory, marked by right-wing, sociopathic beliefs and actions. The continued influence of figures like Braverman and Patel, along with the party’s flirtation with populist rhetoric akin to that of Nigel Farage, represents a stark departure from the inclusive, compassionate conservatism that once defined the party. The embrace of divisive policies and the marginalisation of moderate voices create an environment that is increasingly hostile to those who advocate for a more centrist and humane approach to politics.

The Conservative Party should remain confident about its nature and not seek to pander to Reform UK and its supporters, despite the damage done to them by Reform UK in the recent elections. Aligning with such extremist elements would only further alienate moderate voices and undermine the party’s long-term viability.

Ultimately, the future of the Conservative Party hinges on its ability to reclaim the centre ground. Demonstrating both compassion and competence is not only the right course of action but also the only viable path to regaining public trust and electoral success. The choices made in the coming months will determine not only the party’s direction but also whether it retains supporters like myself, who yearn for a return to a more inclusive and moderate conservatism. This is the challenge that lies ahead for the Conservative Party, and its response will define its place in British politics for years to come.

Meet the new MP for Mid Sussex

The election of Liberal Democrat Alison Bennett to the parliamentary seat for Mid Sussex represents a significant shift in the political landscape of this traditionally Conservative stronghold. Her victory is a testament to her extensive campaign and the resonance of her platform with the local electorate.

Bennett’s academic background includes a degree in Social and Political Sciences from the University of Cambridge, obtained in 1999. She initially pursued a career in business, working at British Airways and later at E.on, where she focused on addressing fuel poverty. These experiences equipped her with a deep understanding of social and economic issues, which she later brought into her political career.

Her journey into politics was driven by a desire to make a tangible difference locally, a sentiment intensified by the political climate following Donald Trump’s election in 2016. Joining the Liberal Democrats in 2015, Bennett quickly rose through the ranks. She was elected as a district councillor for Hurstpierpoint in 2019, a remarkable achievement given the area’s long-standing Conservative dominance. Her election marked a significant shift, as she was the first non-Conservative councillor in the area in living memory.

As a district councillor and leader of the Liberal Democrats on the Mid Sussex District Council, Bennett’s leadership was pivotal. She helped the party become the largest on the council by 2023, forming a minority administration in coalition with independent councillors. This coalition has showcased her ability to navigate complex political landscapes and work towards shared goals despite differing approaches.

Bennett’s parliamentary campaign focused on local issues such as revitalising high streets, ensuring affordable housing, and protecting the environment. She actively opposed the expansion of Gatwick Airport and worked on local initiatives to combat fly-tipping and support refugees through fundraising for the Red Cross.

Her victory in the parliamentary election was bolstered by endorsements from unexpected quarters, including former Conservative councillor Clive Laband. Laband’s endorsement underscored Bennett’s appeal across traditional party lines and reflected a broader desire for change in Mid Sussex.

Now as the MP for Mid Sussex, Bennett faces the challenge of translating her campaign promises into actionable policies. Her priorities include addressing local economic development, enhancing public services, and advocating for environmental sustainability. Critics and supporters alike will be watching closely to see how effectively she can implement her vision for the constituency.

Alison Bennett’s win marks a significant political shift in Mid Sussex. Her journey from the corporate world to local and now national politics highlights her adaptability, determination, and commitment to public service. With her focus on both local and broader issues, she is poised to make a substantial impact in her new role as MP for Mid Sussex.

For more detailed information, you can visit the Mid Sussex Liberal Democrats website and local news coverage on the Sussex Express.

**LIB DEMS TAKE MID SUSSEX**

Result:

Liberal Democrat: 21,136

Conservative: 14,474

Labour: 9,397

Reform UK: 5,921

Green: 2,048

Monster Raving Loony Party: 352

Share of the vote:

Liberal Democrat: 39.6%

Conservative: 27.1%

Labour: 17.6%

Reform UK: 11.1%

Green: 3.8%

Monster Raving Loony Party: 0.7%

Change since 2019:

Liberal Democrat: +14.1%

Conservative: -24.2%

Labour: -0.4%

Reform UK: +11.1%

Green: -0.3%

Monster Raving Loony Party: -0.3%

Enormous congratulations to Alison Bennett, the new Liberal Democrat MP for Mid Sussex.

**BBC SUGGESTS LIB DEMS TO TAKE MID SUSSEX**

Jeremy Vine, on the BBC Election Night show, has suggested that the Lib Dems will take Mid Sussex. (NB This screen is based on the exit poll, NOT results).

**EXIT POLL: MID SUSSEX TOO CLOSE TO CALL, BUT PROBABLE LIB DEM GAIN**

The exit poll has been published and has stated that the result is “too close to call” in Mid Sussex.

That said, the poll gives a 64% chance of a Lib Dem gain and a 36% chance of a Conservative hold.

At the past five general elections, the exit poll has been accurate to within a range of 1.5 and 7.5 seats.